23 Skidoo
You can always tell when a cartoon character is about to run off-screen. The music speeds up and then ends with some flourish. I always think of Snagglepuss saying with an affected accent, “exit, stage left!” And off he would go with the waggle of a leg and yo-dee-do-do. Since the turn of the last century, both 23 and skidoo or skedaddle, meant to get out while the getting was good.
23 is also the number of chromosome pairs in the human genome. Hence the name 23and Me for the first direct-to-consumer genetic testing service using saliva as the testing medium. It started offering partial testing in 2007, was named Time’s Invention of the Year in 2008, and has not looked back since. Now if you pay $395 you get an endless number of reports from health to ancestry to connections to relatives. You get to see where you come from, who you’re related to and what you are genetically pre-disposed towards. This is a big advancement from the early National Geographic tests that showed where your primordial ancestors traveled to get to the place of residence of your most recent progenitors. Those were fun in imagining your early man ancestor traveling out of East Africa, into the Fertile Crescent and up into the Steppes of Middle Asia. From there, they either headed back towards Europe over the Black Sea or down to the Subcontinent of India (and perhaps eventually as far as Australia over land bridges now called Indonesia) or overland into China and Siberia. We now understand that most of the Western Hemisphere was populated by the Baring Sea route coming from Siberia, from whence the headed southward.
There you have the migratory history of your family and mankind. What else could you need? It turns out quite a bit. Enter 23and Me. In early 2017 my wife and I must have been bored, so we rustled up all the spit we could muster and put it in test tubes that we sealed and sent away to Mountainview, California, the city in Silicon Valley from which all good technology things come. You might say we 23 skidooed our 23and Me tests for analysis. I think that means that we are relatively early adopters, we are not terribly concerned about privacy (what could be more private than your highly unique and personal genomic profile?), and we are not easily scared by the truth about ourselves. That’s quite a bit of bravado in this day and age, but I suspect we mostly didn’t think most of this through altogether. Only now in hindsight does it seem filled with bravado. At the time it was mostly driven by a combination of curiosity and novelty.
I remember getting back the results in a few months. The good news was that the health information was all pretty positive. I was a bit more immune to the great ills of cancer, diabetes, Parkinson’s, Alzheimers and male pattern baldness than my wife, but we both stacked up as genetically healthy. My 100-year-old mother had given me a prior clue that such might be the case, but it’s always nice to see it scientifically affirmed.
The best part of the test results for me was that it said I had the musculature of an “elite performance athlete.” That alone was worth the $395 to me. I dined out on that little factoid for a few months. People have applied many adjectives to me over the years, but I don’t recall anyone calling me an elite performance athlete. Maybe if I carried 150 pounds less on my 6’5” frame I could make that claim and have it believed. Just knowing that capability is under there somewhere is very reassuring to me. The “I could do that if I wanted to” line is pretty powerful or at least good humor. It might explain why I was able to surprise people and excel at sports like skiing and squash, where size was not an overwhelming impediment to excellence. Mostly, it’s just a fun personal attribute to pull out at various times in hearty conversations.
After that died down, I didn’t have much added use for my 23and Me data and reports. The unexamined self may be wasted, but the over-examined self comes close. How much navel contemplation can possibly be good for you?
Then, tonight my daughter came over and wanted to discuss her 23and Me results. There was nothing bad in her report, but she was confused by the ancestral background. She thought she was Czech on he mother’s side and Czech/Italian on my side. She came out 100% European, but the mix including Germanic and other Southern European blends was confusing to her. She was also curious about her family connections. I walked her through my thoughts about all that, which was easily explainable based on my known historical lineage knowledge. Then she asked me the big question, why was I not on her family list if I had done 23and Me. That’s when that “exit stage left” music starts to play.
I went back into my email files and found my 23and Me results transmittal email. I clicked through and opened up a report which had evolved into a much more colorful and interesting report. I didn’t see any family connections and my daughter then showed me how to toggle that element on. There was a drumroll moment of truth while 23and Me processed the results of my family connections from their database and calculated the degree of connections.
Voila! My daughter came up on the top of a list of 1,137 relatives. She and I are 48.9% genetically connected. Below her is my half-sister (easy to identify from the profile), with whom I am 25% genetically connected. Those statistics both seem to make sense to me. All the relatives below that went down into single digit connections. Indeed, I barely recognized any of those names. I have no need to go chase down any of those relations, but I am glad my daughter felt fulfilled with her own self-discovery process.
My guess is that I won’t call up my 23and Me reports again until another child or close relative goes off on a similar search of their ancestry. I know enough and am as reassured as I care to be. I suppose that 23and Me might give some a desire to 23 Skidoo if the results aren’t perfect, but in our family case, the best we could muster was, “Heavens to Murgatroyd!”
Dear Rich and Kim,
‘Hold onto your hats’ but I have a few comments. Thanks to John F Kennedy for setting the new fashion of no hats. We’re you aware that when Clark Gable took off his shirt in ‘It Happened One Night’, he wasn’t wearing an undershirt. Sales of undershirts plummeted by 70 to 80% almost overnight.
My first thought is about phrases we grew up with that the younger generation (unless they watch old movies) haven’t a clue about. When I call a company I will often use vernacular that might fly right over the representatives head. I always tell them that they are too young to get my meaning. It’s safer than assuming they’re old like me. 23 skidoo and exit stage left are two of them. Have you tried ‘cheese It, the cops !’, ‘not firing on all eight’ (when was the last eight cylinder engine even made?), ‘screw the pooch’, ‘honest to goodness’, ‘lose your marbles’, ‘off the hook,’ ‘beat around the bush,’ ‘bite the bullet’, ‘cut a rug’, ‘in the bag’, etc, etc, etc (to quote Yul Brynner).
Try asking younger people who was ‘James Cagney’, ‘Humphrey Bogart’, ‘Lauren Bacall’, ‘Gregory Peck’, Charlton Heston (AKA Moses)’,‘Jimmy Stewart’, ‘Henry Fonda’. Move it up to ‘Steve McQueen’, ‘Paul Newman’, ‘Robert Redford’.
Don’t even get me started on movies. ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’, ‘Gone With The Wind’. My God! Yes, ‘The Godfather’ also.
Remember getting requests to have your ancestry researched and you would get a book with your lineage? I figured that they probably sent a few variations of the same info. No, I don’t believe I was related to Cleopatra. I also don’t believe that I inherited $15 million dollars and just have to send a finders fee to Nigeria to get it.
The previous was just for fun. The 23andMe is a serious company that does do what they say. I haven’t done it because our daughter is a redhead, our oldest son was blonde and our youngest is a dark brunette. I don’t want to find out about the plumber, the electrician and the milkman. I also don’t want to learn how much Neanderthal I am made of. I have my kids to tell me that.
Rather, it’s that I am concerned about how the information garnered will be used. Even before DNA there was a famous case about a doctor discovering a certain women’s blood had amazing qualities that he used to his great financial benefit. He didn’t tell her, of course, but kept coming back for more samples to ‘keep track of her health’. Nice guy.
Our daughter is a doctor who, by coincidence, lives in the middle of many pharmaceutical companies’ national headquarters. That is just an aside. She has always maintained that drug companies are evil without any humor in her statement. PBS did a special called ‘Opioid Nation’. Watch it and you will become a believer.
Opioids were introduced as an effective pain reliever, and they are. They were also touted to be non-addictive. We know now that that is definitely not the case. I will wager that somewhere in the drug companies files are memos that refer to them being addictive, but remember, don’t tell anyone.
Back to the DNA. There is virtually nothing more private about us. And informative. The FDA has already contacted 23andMe and questioned their handling of this information. 23andMe sort of ignored that inquiry and continued as they had all along. I’m sure there are other companies that provide the same services with the same liaise faire attitude. In one way you can’t blame them for wanting to maximize profits. But like so many apps and websites they depend on us consumers to not read fully the agreement you are accepting. I’m guilty as charged along with most others I’ll bet. In Europes recent law changes governing internet companies activities they have mandated that these agreements be written in plain, easy to understand language. What a novel idea.
Back to my paranoia. Last year GlaxoSmithKline bought $300 million worth of 23andMe. There’s two bedfellows that concern me. Of course this is strictly to help the drug company understand the information better with such a huge sample group. From there they will be able to develop and generate new treatments. Your privacy will be closely guarded. Hmmm.
I just read in a Time Magazine article from last July that there is a major flaw in this idea. I’m not saying I don’t trust the drug companies but I don’t trust the drug companies. That isn’t the flaw. The problem resides in that the general and poorer population can’t afford these tests and probably don’t care in the first place. Therefore the sample base that is being used is heavily skewed toward the more affluent population. The results can’t possibly be truly representative of the national makeup. What is needed is many more lower priced or free tests for the general public. They have to be included to get a realistic picture.
I don’t know where all these things are headed. I have a theory that eventually they will take a babies umbilical chord and be able to map out their life expectancies, proper diet to follow and much, much more.
Then my paranoia extends to all those altruistic Insurace companies circling like vultures waiting to get their oh so helpful hands on that DNA information.
Is my thinking nuts ? I already know I go on too long so don’t complain about that.
Sincerely, Soon To Be Living On A Mountaintop In Tibet, Lonny
You worry too much by my standards. I guess you’re worrying for both of us, so thanks.
Someone has to do it.
Or
I know I’m paranoid but am I paranoid enough?